|
jeremyh113
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Name: Jeremy Birthday: 6/9/1985 Gender: Male
Interests: I enjoy theology, music, economics, philosophy, politics, history, chess, math, logic, and maybe some other things. Expertise: I wish Occupation: tutor, college student
Message: message meEmail: email me
Member Since:
3/10/2006
|
|
| Well I managed to get through midterms in one piece, and my paper wasn’t as terrible as I though it would be. Now it’s spring break, and I’m gonna visit Covenant College next week. That should be fun. I got a lot of reading done yesterday, more than I’ve been able to in a while, so I’m happy about that. Hopefully I can get a lot more done over the break. | | |
| Currently reading: "The Mysteries of Linwood Hart" by Richard Russo Midterms next week, and that means I've got papers due. This weekend I've managed to get quite a bit done, so hopefully I can pull off some decent grades. Right now I'm feeling ok. Maybe I'll play chess or something. It can be difficult to decide what to do in my spare time, since there are so many possibilities. Like should I read a book, or listen to music, or watch TV? But hey, at least I have those choices, right? Things could be a lot worse. Speaking of which, I just found a great web site called Despair.com, which has provided me with some much appreciated humor. Maybe that's why I'm feeling ok despite the upcoming midterms. I guess that's it for now, so have fun y'all. | | |
|  | Currently Listening Nixon in China By John Adams, Edo de Waart, Trudy Ellen Craney, Marion Dry, John Duykers, Stephanie Friedman, Thomas Hammons see related |
from Matthew 6 (The Sermon on the Mount): 25Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment? 26Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? 27Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? 28And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: 29And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith? 31Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? 32(For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. 33But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. 34Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof. Sadly, I have spent far too much time worrying about these sorts of things (actually, I've often worried about things far less important than food and clothes). Anyway, here are some excerpts from John Calvin's commentary on this section of the Bible: "...Christ reproves that excessive anxiety, with which men torment themselves, about food and clothing, and, at the same time, applies a remedy for curing this disease. When he forbids them to be anxious, this is not to be taken literally, as if he intended to take away from his people all care. We know that men are born on the condition of having some care; and, indeed, this is not the least portion of the miseries, which the Lord has laid upon us as a punishment, in order to humble us. But immoderate care is condemned for two reasons: either because in so doing men tease and vex themselves to no purpose, by carrying their anxiety farther than is proper or than their calling demands; or because they claim more for themselves than they have a right to do, and place such a reliance on their own industry, that they neglect to call upon God. We ought to remember this promise: though unbelievers shall "rise up early, and sit up late, and eat the bread of sorrows," yet believers will obtain, through the kindness of God, rest and sleep, (Psalm 127:2.) Though the children of God are not free from toil and anxiety, yet, properly speaking, we do not say that they are anxious about life: because, through their reliance on the providence of God, they enjoy calm repose." "Matthew 6:25. Is not the life of more value than food? He argues from the greater to the less. He had forbidden them to be excessively anxious about the way in which life might be supported; and he now assigns the reason. The Lord, who has given life itself, will not suffer us to want what is necessary for its support. And certainly we do no small dishonor to God, when we fail to trust that he will give us necessary food or clothing; as if he had thrown us on the earth at random. He who is fully convinced, that the Author of our life has an intimate knowledge of our condition, will entertain no doubt that he will make abundant provision for our wants. Whenever we are seized by any fear or anxiety about food, let us remember, that God will take care of the life which he gave us." "Your heavenly Father feedeth them This deserves careful attention: for, though we are unable to explain the manner in which their life is supported, which of us is in the habit of considering that their life depends on the providence of God, which he is pleased to extend even to them? But if it is thoroughly fixed in our minds, that the fowls are supplied with food by the hand of God, there will be no difficulty in expecting it for ourselves, who are formed after his image, and reckoned among his children. They neither sow nor reap By these words it is far from being our Lord’s intention to encourage us to indolence and sluggishness. All that he means is, that, though other means fail, the providence of God is alone sufficient for us, for it supplies the animals abundantly with every thing that they need." "Matthew 6:33. But rather seek first the kingdom of God This is another argument for restraining excessive anxiety about food. It argues a gross and indolent neglect of the soul, and of the heavenly life. Christ reminds us that there is the greatest inconsistency in men, who are born to a better life, being wholly employed about earthly objects. He who assigns the first rank to the kingdom of God, will not carry beyond moderation his anxiety about food. Nothing is better adapted to restrain the wantonness of the flesh from breaking out in the course of the present life, than meditation on the life of the heavens. The word righteousness may be either understood as applying to God, or to the kingdom: for we know that the kingdom of God consists in righteousness, (Romans 14:17,) that is, in the newness of spiritual life. All other things shall be added This means, that those things which relate to the present life are but favorable appendages, and ought to be reckoned greatly inferior to the kingdom of God" | | |
| Currently listening: Critical Thinking lecures by Greg Bahnsen Last prayer meeting our pastor spoke on how we should pray persistently, as Jesus urged us in Luke 11: 5And he said unto them, Which of you shall have a friend, and shall go unto him at midnight, and say unto him, Friend, lend me three loaves; 6For a friend of mine in his journey is come to me, and I have nothing to set before him? 7And he from within shall answer and say, Trouble me not: the door is now shut, and my children are with me in bed; I cannot rise and give thee. 8I say unto you, Though he will not rise and give him, because he is his friend, yet because of his importunity he will rise and give him as many as he needeth. 9And I say unto you, Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you. 10For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened. 11If a son shall ask bread of any of you that is a father, will he give him a stone? or if he ask a fish, will he for a fish give him a serpent? 12Or if he shall ask an egg, will he offer him a scorpion? 13If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children: how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him? I'm wondering, is there a point when we should stop praying for something? Paul says in 2 Corinthians 12: 7And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure. 8For this thing I besought the Lord thrice, that it might depart from me. 9And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. It may seem a little strange that Paul would only pray three times about this, but the commentators I read say this simply means that Paul prayed repeatedly. I guess that makes sense. Clearly God answered the prayer, but not in the way Paul had hoped. Does this mean he stopped praying about it? And if so, does that mean there comes a point when we should stop praying about something? How do we know when God has answered a prayer negatively? I think there may be cases when we never know how God has answered (or will answer) a certain prayer, at least not until we are with Him. In these cases, it appears that we should still continue to pray persistently, but also understand that God's grace is sufficient for us. Any thoughts? | | |
| Currently listening: Transcendental Arguments lectures by Greg Bahnsen and Mike Butler on the proof of God's existence Here's a question for y'all. Can art be objectively considered either "good" or "lousy"? Or is the goodness or lousyness of a work of art entirely subjective? For example, can we really say that Beethoven was a great composer, or can we merely say, either "I happen to like Beethoven's music" or else "I happen to not like Beethoven's music"? Personally, I lean toward the idea that the value of art is subjective, since I am unaware of any objective standard that would allow us to identify a particular work of art as either great or lousy or mediocre. But I'd love to hear your thoughts. ~Jeremy | | |
|